taxonomy.works
Polski

Selected work

Every piece of work with its numbers, division architecture and an explicit boundary of what it does not cover. The public register shows open research and in-house systems where full data, rules and decision logs can be inspected without NDA constraints.

  1. REF.01 own project · skillsintelligence.tools · 2026

    A GenAI competency atlas with a full decision record

    Growing a competency atlas from 269 to 426 entries without breaking a single identifier or deep link, with every contested classification decision on the record.

    • Design
    • Audit
    • Governance
    Competencies in atlas
    269 → 426
    Ontology relations
    435 → 591
    Spurious edges removed
    474
    Entries in decision record
    2,514

  2. REF.02 own project · skillsintelligence.tools · 2026

    An AI glossary reconciled across twenty-two models

    414 entries covering 2023–2026, each with a maturity rating, a Polish equivalent and a place in the relation graph — shipped as an embeddable component.

    • Design
    Glossary entries
    414
    Models across three rounds
    22
    Maturity rating coverage
    414/414
    Relations in concept graph
    75 → 104

  3. REF.03 own project · skillsintelligence.tools · 2026

    A concept graph in which source agreement turned out to be a prompt echo

    A map of the skills-intelligence domain — what differs from what, and what has to exist before what — with four evidence tiers and a separate register of claims the research prompt itself planted in the sources.

    • Audit
    • Design
    • Governance
    Concepts / relations
    191 / 322
    Prompt-seeded concepts
    48
    Claims corrected in verification
    7 of 8
    Sources
    51

  4. REF.04 own project · psychology.games · 2026

    A taxonomy whose rules were put through a blind reproducibility test

    A classification of psychological games, phenomena and methods in which every category boundary is a yes/no rule — and in which those rules went through a blind test, repair and re-measurement before earning a new version number.

    • Design
    • Audit
    • Governance
    Branches / leaves
    7 / 26
    Agreement with intent
    20/25 → 23/25
    Stable across 3 runs (v5)
    24/25
    Boundary-probe readings
    18/18

  5. REF.05 own project · wwwtaxonomy.com · 2026

    A taxonomy of web projects based on outcome, not technology

    26 mutually exclusive types of web project, decided by a four-gate cascade and 88 yes/no boundary rules — tested against 78 real project folders.

    • Design
    • Audit
    Families / leaf types
    5 / 26
    Boundary rules
    88
    Folders classified
    78
    Composite profiles among projects
    21 / 31

  6. REF.06 own project · FARR/6 atlas · 2026

    A taxonomy of violent death on six independent axes

    A model that, instead of a single "manner of death" label, describes each death on six axes — unit of analysis, agency, intent, consent, institutional mandate, place in the causal chain — and so settles the cases where one-dimensional categories break.

    • Design
    Descriptive axes
    6
    Formal combinations
    57
    Attested / partial / working names
    16 / 13 / 28
    Boundary cases
    6

  7. REF.07 own project · centralconcepts.org · 2026

    A 200-concept atlas with an evidentiary taxonomy of intellectual lineage

    A bilingual atlas of 200 concepts and 1,131 relations pairing conceptual briefings with an explicit classification of Central European intellectual lineages — separating documented influence from anticipation, parallel discovery and counterpoint.

    • Design
    • Audit
    • Governance
    Concepts / graph edges
    200 / 1,131
    Relation types / evidence states
    6 / 4
    Titles restored in canonicalisation
    63
    Bilingual corpus (PL + EN)
    2 × 200